Why do men survive heat, knives, and 14-hour shifts in hotel kitchens—but freeze at the sight of a gas stove at home?
Because masculinity doesn’t fear labour. It fears care.
This piece is about how cooking becomes masculine only when it brings power, visibility, and status—and why equality is far more threatening than fire.
If Masculinity Can Survive Heat, Knives and Long Hours in Hotel Kitchens, Why Does it Collapse at the Sight of a Gas Stove at Home?
Because the danger masculinity fears is not heat or knives—but the loss of privilege.
A hotel kitchen does not threaten masculinity; a home kitchen does. The difference lies not in labour, skill, or effort, but in what cooking means in each space.
In a hotel, cooking is power without care.
In a home, cooking is care without power.
Masculinity survives where cooking brings:
- Authority over others
- Public recognition
- Wages and status
- Distance from emotional responsibility
A hotel kitchen is hierarchical, competitive, and visible. It allows men to command space, issue orders, and be celebrated as “chefs.” Masculinity thrives because the labour produces status.
The home kitchen produces something else entirely:
- Repetition rather than creativity
- Service rather than command
- Responsibility rather than recognition
- Emotional labour alongside physical labour
To cook at home is not just to prepare food; it is to accept accountability for daily life—for hunger, satisfaction, timing, and harmony. Patriarchal masculinity is structured precisely to avoid this accountability.
That is why masculinity retreats at the gas stove.
Cooking at home dissolves the fiction that care is natural to women and optional for men. It exposes domestic labour as work, not instinct. And once that exposure happens, gender hierarchy becomes visible—and therefore unstable.
So masculinity does not collapse because the task is difficult.
It collapses because the task demands equality.
And equality, in patriarchal systems, is far more threatening than fire.
Comments
Post a Comment